Exposing the Marcoses: HISTORY AND THE AGE OF ALTERNATIVE FACT
Image Source: History and the Age of Alternative Fact - Thrive Global
I think people should know this. I got most of this information from Meilou Sereno herself.
FAKE AMBUSH BY PRESIDENT MARCOS AND SECRETARY ENRILE, WITH SCRIPT AND DIARY, TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW
• Excerpt from GMA News VIDEO: Sen. Enrile, answered the alleged forgery in his assassination before declaring Martial Law: https://youtu.be/xbTUCAp5Gho
• Excerpt from ABS-CBN News video: A retired Philippine Constabulary-Integrated National Police (PC-INP) general who investigated the September 1972 ambush on then martial law administrator Juan Ponce Enrile believes the ambush was fake, contrary to Enrile's own claim that it was real.
https://youtu.be/sAFuj4dkiE4
Here are the links to the graphic images from the Asiaweek news item, the Inquirer piece, Marcos' diary entry, and the link to the Martial Law Museum website where Primitivo Mijares is quoted:
• Asiaweek, March 1986 - https://drive.google.com/.../1zGWC7g2xxxSyi47jGuZ.../view...
• Inquirer Article - https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/.../true-or-false-was-1972...
• Diary entry of Marcos on Enrile ambush - https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/.../Marcos-September...
• Excerpt from Waltzing With A Dictator by Raymond Bonner - https://drive.google.com/.../12QK.../view...
• Excerpt from The-Conjugal-Dictatorship-of-Ferdinand-and-Imelda-Marcos - https://drive.google.com/.../1wWTf5JrxM6.../view...
AND LEAST 13 CRONIES HAVE CONFESSED TO THEFT OF MARCOS, AND 5 COURT DECISIONS (3 IN THE PHILIPPINES, 1 IN THE UNITED STATES, AND 1 IN SWITZERLAND) HAVE JUDGED THAT THEY WERE CRIMINALITY OR STOLE A LARGE PART OF THE WEALTH OF MARCOS.
• New Jersey, United States (September 13, 1986). A New Jersey court awarded more than 1.3 million dollars in favor of the Philippine government because of evidence that funds found by the Philippine government in a bank in New Jersey, including a building here, were stolen. wealth of the Marks. This is the court's statement, according to American newspapers: The judge, Paul G. Levy, sitting in the Chancery Division, said the evidence provided (d) by the Aquino government "proved without any doubt that the monies recovered and property involved belong" to the Philippines." In it, Judge Paul G. Levy, of the Chancery Division (of the State of New Jersey, United States), said that the evidence provided by the government of President Aquino proved, beyond doubt, that the money and property in question were Philippine property (and not Marcos').
• (December of 1997)
This is the official statement of Switzerland's Federal Office of Justice:
"The Marcos case began in 1986 when the Federal Council ordered bank accounts to be frozen." In 1990, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court approved the handover to the Philippines of bank documents relating to the Marcos family, but ruled that the actual return of assets would be conditional upon a final and absolute judgment by a Philippine court. In 1997, the Court established that the majority of the Marcos foundation assets were of criminal origin and permitted their transfer to an escrow account in Manila, even though no Philippine court ruling had yet been issued.
The following are the final Supreme Court decisions in which the Marcoses were found to have forfeited their rights:
2003 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED USD 658,175,373.60 IN 5 SWISS FOUNDATION ACCOUNTS WITH INTEREST AS OF 2002 JANUARY ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH OR STOLEN WEALTH BY THE MARCOSES
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
• 2012 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED ARELMA ACCOUNT IN SINGAPORE ESTIMATED TO BE USD 3,369,975 AS OF 1983 PLUS ALL INTEREST, CLAIMED BY THE MARCOSES BECAUSE IT WAS STOLEN WEALTH
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
• 2017 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED THE JEWELRY COLLECTION BY IMELDA MARCOS WORTH AT LEAST USD 150,000 BECAUSE IT WAS ILL-GOTTEN OR STOLEN WEALTH
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
• 5 court decisions (from New Jersey, Switzerland, and the Philippines) all strongly declare MARCOS STOLE. All of that is FINAL AND EXECUTORY. Those who say it is not final and executed/executive are just cheating. That term is used in other documents but not in the main decision. The final and executory status of the decisions will be reflected in the SC resolutions rejecting the Motion for Reconsideration. And the Clerk of Court issued an Entry of Judgment. The accomplices returned the stolen items:
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
https://www.rappler.com/.../in.../marcos-cronies-compromise
https://www.philstar.com/.../marcos-145crony146-found...
• In 1986, US Court judge returned to the Philippines more than $1.3 million in bank accounts and New Jersey real estate obtained for deposed President Ferdinand E. Marcos with money allegedly stolen from the Philippine treasury.
https://www.latimes.com/.../la-xpm-1986-09-13-mn-11697...
• MANILA WINS RULING IN JERSEY ON MARCOS ESTATE AND CASH
https://www.nytimes.com/.../manila-wins-ruling-in-jersey...
• In 1997, the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland established that the majority of the Marcos foundation assets were of criminal origin and permitted their transfer to an escrow account in Manila.
https://www.bj.admin.ch/.../akt.../news/2003/2003-08-05.html
• SWISS FEDERAL OFFICE OF JUSTICE STATEMENT
https://apnews.com/article/c07b7891fc6bb9d738b1b436f572866f
THEY INITIATED A STRATEGY OF POLITICAL IDOLATRY. STRONG AND BEAUTIFUL. FERDINAND MARCOS SR. WITH THE FABRICATED WAR EXPLOIT STORIES (CONFIRMED AS FICTITIOUS BY THE US GOVERNMENT AND THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL COMMISSION).
MARCOS' PLAN TO INVADE by C-SPAN
From 19:40 time mark — Marcos' plan to overthrow the Aquino Government
https://www.c-span.org/video/?150886-1/marcos-plan-invade&start=$(start)#
• 1:57:32 — 2:07:00 timemark
Marcos talks about his gold.
• Transcript of Marcos' conversation with Richard Hirschfeld about gold.
https://drive.google.com/.../1AVWKk0O54mvJEHAQ3IM.../view...
• THE MARCOS' GOLD BUDOL-BUDOL STORY
https://fb.watch/aLciDPhwHm/
• Philippines given access to over USD 683 million by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
https://www.bj.admin.ch/.../akt.../news/2003/2003-08-05.html
• Swiss Banks Ordered to Give Marcos Millions to Philippines
https://apnews.com/article/c07b7891fc6bb9d738b1b436f572866f
• FERDINAND R. MARCOS, JR. PETITIONER, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT, RESPONDENT. [G.R. NO. 189505]
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
THE ABSENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION IS NOT PROOF THAT NOTHING WAS STOLEN BY THE MARCOSES. THERE ARE VARIOUS WAYS TO ESTABLISH THAT TRUTH, AND USUALLY, THIS IS THE FASTER WAY TO RECOVER THE STOLEN WEALTH. THE ESTABLISHMENT THAT THE MARCOSES STOLE WAS CLEARLY STATED BY THE COURT IN THE ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH CASES, in the CONFESSION OF THE CRONIES OR ACCOMPLICE, AND IN THE CONCRETE RETURN OF ASSETS FROM THE STOLEN WEALTH.
• The reason for the Marcoses running in politics according to Imelda, Sandro and Imee Marcos: https://fb.watch/b1Ho5zq9bG/
• Supreme Court Decisons alleging stolen wealth by the Marcoses:
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
• COA-audited report of PCGG during the time of Cory, Ramos, Erap, Arroyo, Aquino III, and Duterte: Php billion STOLEN WEALTH recovered, now PhP 174 billion.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=306724931264895&id=100057821720820
• Duterte’s PCGG: PhP 125 billion more of STOLEN WEALTH to be recovered.
https://drive.google.com/.../1-lnDpi1Zb5yDn9djc9j.../view...
https://pcgg.gov.ph/.../2019-PCGG-Year-End-Accomplishment...
https://pcgg.gov.ph/.../2018-PCGG-Year-End-Accomplishment...
https://drive.google.com/.../1dYIa.../view...
https://drive.google.com/.../1dYIa.../view...
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=308578494412872&id=100057821720820
Duterte ordered PCGG to sell the STOLEN WEALTH jewelries of Imelda. Sandiganbayan and Supreme Court: In the Sandiganbayan, Imelda never said that her jewelries were gifts from kings and queens of other countries, she just said that to him, without explaining the source. The courts said, those are STOLEN WEALTH.PCGG and Bangko Sentral: Kris Aquino never touched the Imelda jewelries.
https://fb.watch/9282WVB5V-/
https://www.untvweb.com/.../duterte-issues-formal-order.../
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1071376
Supreme Court: Marcoses never explained in any hearing, any legitimate source for all their nakakalulang WEALTH, so, UNDER THE LAW, the 1955 Anti Ill-Gotten Wealth Act, if YOU ARE A PUBLIC OFFICIAL, DECLARED ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH YAN AND THE PENALTY IS FORFEITURE in government.
https://lawphil.net/.../juri1988/apr1988/gr_77663_1988.html
https://lawphil.net/.../juri1987/may1987/gr_75885_1987.html
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/.../executive-order.../
The 1955 Ill-Gotten Wealth Act says: When you’re a public official, and you can’t explain your enormous wealth, like Imelda’s Jewelry Collection, that Imelda never told the court it was a gift to her but from their own wealth. If you don't have enough explanation, except tell them to you, that is: STOLEN WEALTH, THAT WEALTH COMES FROM ILLEGALITY. So it will be judged that it MUST BE RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=306724931264895&id=100057821720820
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=320457489891639&id=100057821720820
It is not true that 1954 Swiss bank accounts were opened, before Marcos became president. The Supreme Court said, 1968, 3rd year of Marcos ’presidency, when he and Imelda opened Swiss bank accounts.
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
Ferdinand Marcos Sr. was caught of the US Government buying weapons and planning to book a flight back to the Philippines to war the government of President Corazon Aquino and hostage Cory.
• Excerpt from GMA News VIDEO: Sen. Enrile, answered the alleged forgery in his assassination before declaring Martial Law: https://youtu.be/xbTUCAp5Gho
• Excerpt from ABS-CBN News video: A retired Philippine Constabulary-Integrated National Police (PC-INP) general who investigated the September 1972 ambush on then martial law administrator Juan Ponce Enrile believes the ambush was fake, contrary to Enrile's own claim that it was real.
https://youtu.be/sAFuj4dkiE4
Here are the links to the graphic images from the Asiaweek news item, the Inquirer piece, Marcos' diary entry, and the link to the Martial Law Museum website where Primitivo Mijares is quoted:
• Asiaweek, March 1986 - https://drive.google.com/.../1zGWC7g2xxxSyi47jGuZ.../view...
• Inquirer Article - https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/.../true-or-false-was-1972...
• Diary entry of Marcos on Enrile ambush - https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/.../Marcos-September...
• Excerpt from Waltzing With A Dictator by Raymond Bonner - https://drive.google.com/.../12QK.../view...
• Excerpt from The-Conjugal-Dictatorship-of-Ferdinand-and-Imelda-Marcos - https://drive.google.com/.../1wWTf5JrxM6.../view...
AND LEAST 13 CRONIES HAVE CONFESSED TO THEFT OF MARCOS, AND 5 COURT DECISIONS (3 IN THE PHILIPPINES, 1 IN THE UNITED STATES, AND 1 IN SWITZERLAND) HAVE JUDGED THAT THEY WERE CRIMINALITY OR STOLE A LARGE PART OF THE WEALTH OF MARCOS.
• New Jersey, United States (September 13, 1986). A New Jersey court awarded more than 1.3 million dollars in favor of the Philippine government because of evidence that funds found by the Philippine government in a bank in New Jersey, including a building here, were stolen. wealth of the Marks. This is the court's statement, according to American newspapers: The judge, Paul G. Levy, sitting in the Chancery Division, said the evidence provided (d) by the Aquino government "proved without any doubt that the monies recovered and property involved belong" to the Philippines." In it, Judge Paul G. Levy, of the Chancery Division (of the State of New Jersey, United States), said that the evidence provided by the government of President Aquino proved, beyond doubt, that the money and property in question were Philippine property (and not Marcos').
• (December of 1997)
This is the official statement of Switzerland's Federal Office of Justice:
"The Marcos case began in 1986 when the Federal Council ordered bank accounts to be frozen." In 1990, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court approved the handover to the Philippines of bank documents relating to the Marcos family, but ruled that the actual return of assets would be conditional upon a final and absolute judgment by a Philippine court. In 1997, the Court established that the majority of the Marcos foundation assets were of criminal origin and permitted their transfer to an escrow account in Manila, even though no Philippine court ruling had yet been issued.
The following are the final Supreme Court decisions in which the Marcoses were found to have forfeited their rights:
2003 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED USD 658,175,373.60 IN 5 SWISS FOUNDATION ACCOUNTS WITH INTEREST AS OF 2002 JANUARY ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH OR STOLEN WEALTH BY THE MARCOSES
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
• 2012 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED ARELMA ACCOUNT IN SINGAPORE ESTIMATED TO BE USD 3,369,975 AS OF 1983 PLUS ALL INTEREST, CLAIMED BY THE MARCOSES BECAUSE IT WAS STOLEN WEALTH
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
• 2017 SUPREME COURT DECISION FORFEITED THE JEWELRY COLLECTION BY IMELDA MARCOS WORTH AT LEAST USD 150,000 BECAUSE IT WAS ILL-GOTTEN OR STOLEN WEALTH
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
• 5 court decisions (from New Jersey, Switzerland, and the Philippines) all strongly declare MARCOS STOLE. All of that is FINAL AND EXECUTORY. Those who say it is not final and executed/executive are just cheating. That term is used in other documents but not in the main decision. The final and executory status of the decisions will be reflected in the SC resolutions rejecting the Motion for Reconsideration. And the Clerk of Court issued an Entry of Judgment. The accomplices returned the stolen items:
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
https://www.rappler.com/.../in.../marcos-cronies-compromise
https://www.philstar.com/.../marcos-145crony146-found...
• In 1986, US Court judge returned to the Philippines more than $1.3 million in bank accounts and New Jersey real estate obtained for deposed President Ferdinand E. Marcos with money allegedly stolen from the Philippine treasury.
https://www.latimes.com/.../la-xpm-1986-09-13-mn-11697...
• MANILA WINS RULING IN JERSEY ON MARCOS ESTATE AND CASH
https://www.nytimes.com/.../manila-wins-ruling-in-jersey...
• In 1997, the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland established that the majority of the Marcos foundation assets were of criminal origin and permitted their transfer to an escrow account in Manila.
https://www.bj.admin.ch/.../akt.../news/2003/2003-08-05.html
• SWISS FEDERAL OFFICE OF JUSTICE STATEMENT
https://apnews.com/article/c07b7891fc6bb9d738b1b436f572866f
THEY INITIATED A STRATEGY OF POLITICAL IDOLATRY. STRONG AND BEAUTIFUL. FERDINAND MARCOS SR. WITH THE FABRICATED WAR EXPLOIT STORIES (CONFIRMED AS FICTITIOUS BY THE US GOVERNMENT AND THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL COMMISSION).
MARCOS' PLAN TO INVADE by C-SPAN
From 19:40 time mark — Marcos' plan to overthrow the Aquino Government
https://www.c-span.org/video/?150886-1/marcos-plan-invade&start=$(start)#
• 1:57:32 — 2:07:00 timemark
Marcos talks about his gold.• Transcript of Marcos' conversation with Richard Hirschfeld about gold.
https://drive.google.com/.../1AVWKk0O54mvJEHAQ3IM.../view...
• THE MARCOS' GOLD BUDOL-BUDOL STORY
https://fb.watch/aLciDPhwHm/
• Philippines given access to over USD 683 million by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
https://www.bj.admin.ch/.../akt.../news/2003/2003-08-05.html
• Swiss Banks Ordered to Give Marcos Millions to Philippines
https://apnews.com/article/c07b7891fc6bb9d738b1b436f572866f
• FERDINAND R. MARCOS, JR. PETITIONER, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT, RESPONDENT. [G.R. NO. 189505]
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
THE ABSENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION IS NOT PROOF THAT NOTHING WAS STOLEN BY THE MARCOSES. THERE ARE VARIOUS WAYS TO ESTABLISH THAT TRUTH, AND USUALLY, THIS IS THE FASTER WAY TO RECOVER THE STOLEN WEALTH. THE ESTABLISHMENT THAT THE MARCOSES STOLE WAS CLEARLY STATED BY THE COURT IN THE ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH CASES, in the CONFESSION OF THE CRONIES OR ACCOMPLICE, AND IN THE CONCRETE RETURN OF ASSETS FROM THE STOLEN WEALTH.
• The reason for the Marcoses running in politics according to Imelda, Sandro and Imee Marcos: https://fb.watch/b1Ho5zq9bG/
• Supreme Court Decisons alleging stolen wealth by the Marcoses:
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/54791
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/62728
• COA-audited report of PCGG during the time of Cory, Ramos, Erap, Arroyo, Aquino III, and Duterte: Php billion STOLEN WEALTH recovered, now PhP 174 billion.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=306724931264895&id=100057821720820
• Duterte’s PCGG: PhP 125 billion more of STOLEN WEALTH to be recovered.
https://drive.google.com/.../1-lnDpi1Zb5yDn9djc9j.../view...
https://pcgg.gov.ph/.../2019-PCGG-Year-End-Accomplishment...
https://pcgg.gov.ph/.../2018-PCGG-Year-End-Accomplishment...
https://drive.google.com/.../1dYIa.../view...
https://drive.google.com/.../1dYIa.../view...
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=308578494412872&id=100057821720820
Duterte ordered PCGG to sell the STOLEN WEALTH jewelries of Imelda. Sandiganbayan and Supreme Court: In the Sandiganbayan, Imelda never said that her jewelries were gifts from kings and queens of other countries, she just said that to him, without explaining the source. The courts said, those are STOLEN WEALTH.
PCGG and Bangko Sentral: Kris Aquino never touched the Imelda jewelries.https://fb.watch/9282WVB5V-/
https://www.untvweb.com/.../duterte-issues-formal-order.../
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1071376
Supreme Court: Marcoses never explained in any hearing, any legitimate source for all their nakakalulang WEALTH, so, UNDER THE LAW, the 1955 Anti Ill-Gotten Wealth Act, if YOU ARE A PUBLIC OFFICIAL, DECLARED ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH YAN AND THE PENALTY IS FORFEITURE in government.
https://lawphil.net/.../juri1988/apr1988/gr_77663_1988.html
https://lawphil.net/.../juri1987/may1987/gr_75885_1987.html
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/.../executive-order.../
The 1955 Ill-Gotten Wealth Act says: When you’re a public official, and you can’t explain your enormous wealth, like Imelda’s Jewelry Collection, that Imelda never told the court it was a gift to her but from their own wealth. If you don't have enough explanation, except tell them to you, that is: STOLEN WEALTH, THAT WEALTH COMES FROM ILLEGALITY. So it will be judged that it MUST BE RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=306724931264895&id=100057821720820
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=320457489891639&id=100057821720820
It is not true that 1954 Swiss bank accounts were opened, before Marcos became president. The Supreme Court said, 1968, 3rd year of Marcos ’presidency, when he and Imelda opened Swiss bank accounts.
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/theboo.../showdocs/1/48708
Ferdinand Marcos Sr. was caught of the US Government buying weapons and planning to book a flight back to the Philippines to war the government of President Corazon Aquino and hostage Cory.
Comments
Post a Comment